P.L. Dunbar Classes


A3 photography (may4)
May 4, 2007, 2:08 pm
Filed under: Photography

Early Days

John Valentine

John Valentine, (1792-185?), set up in business as a print cutter for linen manufacturers in Dundee in the early years of the nineteenth century, but times were hard for the trade and his business went bust. Around 1822 he started a new business as a lithographer and stamp cutter. This was later known as John Valentine & Son when James Valentine ,(1815-79), joined his father working as an engraver in 1832. James started his own business around 1840, and married Rachel Dobson in 1843; their son, William Dobson Valentine (1844-1907) was born the following year, followed later by George Dobson Valentine (1852-90).

James Valentine

James Valentine took up the daguerreotype process in the 1840s, then went to
Paris to study with M. Bulow. On his return in 1850 he took over the printing side of his father’s company.

zSB(3,3)In the mid 1850s that he opened a portrait studio in
Dundee, after he had taken up the wet plate process. The studio, erected in 1855, was the largest ‘photographic glasshouse’ in
Britain.

Portrait Photography

It was soon producing cartes-de-visite photographs, 2 1/4″ x 3 3/4″ (5.5cm x 9.5cm) images mounted on a 2.5×4 inch card. http://www.txdirect.net/~imagine/image/cdv/cdvx.htm These had been made popular by Andre Disderi of Paris, who obtained a patent for them in late 1854, although he was not the inventor.They were a cheap form of print, produced by cameras taking 4, 6 or 10 images on a single glass plate, and the cheapest photographers sold them for as little as 6d a dozen. (A working man at the time might earn around ten to twenty times as much a week.)

Topographic Views

Around 1860, James Valentine decided to add topographic views to the output of the company. His eldest son, William Dobson Valentine, studied chemistry at

London
University before training in landscape photography with Francis Frith, joining the family firm in 1863. His younger son, George Dobson Valentine also took photographs for the company, concentrating on the studio work.

The company soon began to get a good reputation for its scenic photography, produced as albums of prints and single views 4″x3″, 8″x6″, 12″x8″ sold for the wealthier middle class drawing rooms. With the craze for stereo photography, stereo cards were added to the range of views.

Royal Warrant

Queen
Victoria commissioned a series of photographic views from James Valentine in 1866, and he became one of quite a few photographers to be made “Photographer By Special Appointment To Her Majesty, the Queen,” in 1867. The company undertook a wide range of work, including an unsuccessful attempt at underwater photography in connection with the investigation of the

Tay
Bridge disaster of 1879.


Edinburgh Photographic Society

In 1861, James Valentine was one of seven founding members of the Edinburgh Photographic Society (EPS), which continues to the current day. There is some useful historical information about the Valentine family and other photographers on their web site. You can also find out about there about the earlier ‘Photographic Society of Scotland’, founded in 1856. Its membership included some well-known names in early photography, but it appears to have gone into demise shortly before the founding of the EPS, and was wound up in 1873.


16 Comments so far
Leave a comment

This article isn’t really that great. I mean, it’s a biography on this dude who liked photography and did all these things for the art of photography, but unless you’re studying in photography history than really isn’t important. So unfortunately I have to give this article a thumbs down.

Comment by Matt Bradley

This article is more of a historical reference that more or less just tells about photography over the years. This was informative and i learned quite a bit from this article. I think i am now better educated.

Comment by Taylor Watson

this artical is not that intreasting to me because it is about the history of a few photographers and about a few different thing as well. it was hard to keep my attion and realy did not get much form it.

Comment by clint neal

this article is useless for knowing about random people and what they’ve accomplished will not really help us to learn about taking good photos. Sure, knowing about the history of photography is nice to know, but its not valuable to a person unless they had to learn it for a class….

Comment by Will Bradley

The article discusses the beginnings of photography with lithography in the company of James and John Valentine in 1830’s and 40’s. The valentines continued their business with portrait photography and topographics and were commissioned by Queen Victoria. They founded the Edinburgh Photography society in 1861 which continues today.

Comment by Rebecca Beasley

This article is about an old person who made a photo studio in Britain a while ago and how it has impacted photography today. There are many reasons why you would choose to read this article one of which would be to learn some history about photography. This was an interesting article because of its relevance to photography.

Comment by Sarah Clark

this article was boring. it had to do with photography history, and while that itself isn’t so bad, specific people aren’t that interesting to know about. it doesn’t really help us learn how to take better photots, but i guess it did give us a little history lesson.

Comment by brittany jackson

This article is all about 2 men named James and John Valentine. It explains some of the types of photography that they used through out their life. I didn’t really like this article that much, just because it was mostly about history. there weren’t any suggestions for how to take better photos.

Comment by Joe Osborn

ok… this article was about the Valentine family history and what they did with photography … this was probably the worst article we’ve read yet, but its also the last, so I’m not that upset about it … 17 days of school left … yay … um… these dot things are starting to just be dumb … but I’m bored … and I dont want to do my presentation

Comment by Julia Hunt

This article is extremely boring. It’s kind of like the information we were given last semester for our final. Plus I think we already know like half of this stuff. This stuff sucks, if I wanted history I’d be in history class.

Comment by Taylor Hodges

I did not really find this article very interesting because it is about famous photographers, John Valentine, etc… I don’t really enjoy history so I didn’t enjoy reading about other peoples lives. I did learn a couple of facts about them though anyways.

Comment by Rachel Strang

I did not really find this article very amusing because it is about two famous photographers, John and James Valentine. I don’t really enjoy history, so I didn’t enjoy reading about other peoples lives. I did learn a couple of facts about them though anyways.

Comment by Rachel Strang

This is a great Photography blog, thanks for the info.

Comment by Darren

This article really was a biograogy on all these phtographers who thought they were acomplishing something. I really wasn’t into it too much it was kind of boring. I think that it was pointless and it reminded me of a history lesson. I think that it wouldn’t apply to me in the least bit but it was ok.I think that the article should of had a lesson on me and added it to this article and it woul dhave fit right in.

Comment by Jhamicah Harbut

this article was very boring. to tell you the truth i really didnt find anything of interest in the article. except for the little paragraph about that photograpic society the article was basically a waste of time. the bios about the early photograpers was not really fun to read.

Comment by Jared Noffsinger

This article wasnt very interesting. it was a biography on all different kinds of photographers who were trying to acomplish something. It explains some types of photography that they did durring their lives. The article was boring and it didnt keep my attention very well.

Comment by jamie roberts




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>